Comments on: Reflections on “Simultaneous Landscapes” and NFO XPO

By: Chauncey Lotshaw

Chauncey Lotshaw — Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:00:38 +0000

Cool, there are actually some excellent issues on this post most of my readers could find this relevant, I’ll send a link, thanks.

By: playfish

playfish — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:59:25 +0000

i’m frequently scurrying around the net virtually all of the day which means I tend to read quite a lot, which isn’t generally a beneficial matter as most of the websites I discover are made up of unnecessary waste copied from some other web sites a thousand times, nevertheless I have to compliment you because this page is truely decent and even has got some unique information, for that reason cheers for helping to stop the trend of just simply copying other people’s blogs and forums, if you ever wanna have fun with a few hands of myspace poker together with me let me know - you have my email address :)

By: Aspiffruits

Aspiffruits — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:23:10 +0000

?????? ????? ?????? ???, ?? ? ?????? ??????? ?? ????????. ????????????, ??? ??? ???????.

By: Red Rover Experiment #9, Gnoetry at Impossible to work

Red Rover Experiment #9, Gnoetry at Impossible to work — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 05:51:26 +0000

[…] That sounds like an interactive performance, but it really wasn’t. Let’s look at on set piece used to create an office environment and how it was misused in the performance: the coffee maker. Structures Without Integrity used a coffee maker at Version>06 for the piece “Simultaneous Landscapes.” Here’s how we used it: we gave out free coffee to anybody who wanted a cup, actively asking people if they wanted any. What did this do? It made people stop and ask us what we were doing and drew many people into the work. How did it function at the Gnoetry reading? It was reserved for the performers and those in the audience who had very close ties to them. So not only was the audience not allowed to interact with this mundane (and very authentic) piece of the environment, but those who were allowed this interaction were part of a select group. The 4th wall, which is supposed to be nonexistent in an interactive performance, was actively built by the performers while a select few were allowed into the environment. Already we’re being held at a distance by the performers (unless we’re part of a select group), what now? […]